| |
hedning
Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 4732 |
Handle id #30971 : agd
"Yet another fake handle". Please connect it to the real scener in question, if possible, please. Or I'll do it. I'd say it's dmd, based on the style. |
|
| |
iAN CooG
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 3201 |
Can I start linking all fake identities I know to their real handles? =) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11391 |
please do it (i always did, and why wouldnt i) |
| |
Tim
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 467 |
I'd tend to agree matching alternative handles when discovered, perhaps not as important now but reading back in 10 years it might be (OMG <-> Antichrist just to name an example)..
As long as real names are not published, and as long as you are certain with proof to a certain degree I'd say yep, that's what a database like csdb should do (and magazine editors should try to uncover :p)
That said, "fake" handles feels a bit wrong to use, for me "fake" implies budget-label handles, rather than a second (or third..) serious handle. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11391 |
this "fake" vs "non fake" is complete BS anyway. |
| |
Tim
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 467 |
oh great.. I was worried we'd agree again in a thread.. thanks for the quick recovery Groepaz :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11391 |
Obviously current leethaxxors must oppose - seeing how most of what they release today would have been "fake-group" material a while ago :=) |
| |
Smasher
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 521 |
Quote:(...)but reading back in 10 years it might be (OMG <-> Antichrist just to name an example)..
what about 25+ years? time flies!... :) |
