User Comment
Submitted by JCB [PM] on 25 July 2010
@Geir I totally get the point that it's not a c64 production so doesn't belong here it's just your analogy was somewhat flawed ;)

User Comment
Submitted by Oswald [PM] on 25 July 2010
JCB & STE, please read the rules of CSDb under the Help tab, to avoid clashes like this. It's not that the people here are all angry trolls with negative vibes, you just have to read the rules to understand.

http://noname.c64.org/csdb/help.php?section=rules

@ #8

User Comment
Submitted by Geir [PM] on 25 July 2010
@JCB. I see you didn't get my point. Whatever. Make that demo instead.

User Comment
Submitted by JCB [PM] on 25 July 2010
Now you're giving me ideas and I've already got loads of code to write! ;)

User Comment
Submitted by Conrad [PM] on 25 July 2010
What would be even cooler, is that the prince of Persia REALLY does jump from one side border to the other! ;)

User Comment
Submitted by Marauder/GSS [PM] on 25 July 2010
yeah JCB, go for it! (: I really would luv to see a new demo with graphix from Ste'86, that would rock! (:

User Comment
Submitted by JCB [PM] on 25 July 2010
hmm, but Ste specifically re-drew all those frames at 2:1 res 4 colours. If there was an app that would import them and put them into an array of sprites you'd have a big load of animation frames for a game WITHOUT any change in quality/detail of what is there. Converting an mp3 isn't the same thing. Converting an mp3 to a sid and loading that on the C64 is.

I'd say just delete it Ste, if it's not in the remit of the site then there's no point dealing with the hassle of people demanding it not be here. I'll finish my sprite grabber and we can make a little demo out of it and upload it again..

User Comment
Submitted by Geir [PM] on 25 July 2010
I think it is really cool that STE'86 is having this nostalgy and interest at the moment. But it is true STE, it doesn't belong here as it is not a executable C64 file. Would be hilarious if all us musicians uploaded MP3 files and said: "this could be a C64 tune". Don't you see the point? Convert, and make a C-64 executable out of this. Then it should be ok. Put a nifty Hubbard tune on it or something. ;-)

User Comment
Submitted by Knoeki [PM] on 25 July 2010
It's still not a C64 release, as already said.

User Comment
Submitted by STE'86 [PM] on 25 July 2010
perhaps because its a complete set of sprites that are coder ready for implementation for a game that was never released on the c64 and that's on dozens of "wants" lists across the net?

User Comment
Submitted by Knoeki [PM] on 25 July 2010
I have checked the .zip, and all I see in it, are a load of .gif's and a .psd here and there. I've not been able to locate any c64 executables of any kind, so I too don't see why this should be on CSDb.

User Comment
Submitted by STE'86 [PM] on 25 July 2010
have u ACTUALLY downloaded that zip before u spouted this bollocks? you would find that it isnt an animated gif its ALL the spritesheets for POP in c64 res that could be implemented by a coder into a game

User Comment
Submitted by iAN CooG [PM] on 25 July 2010
Animated GIF can be played on C64? I don't see how this can belong to CSDb and anyway it's not a "C64 Graphic collection" at all.
Either convert this to a C64 program or remove.

User Comment
Submitted by STE'86 [PM] on 25 July 2010
absolutely no idea if this is valid on here, so if it isnt just tell me. these were done at the end of last year for no special reason other than prove a point. They are all in 3 colour + transparent GIF format and conform to regular c64 sprite sizes. they were not done with hires overlays on purpose, so they could be atari 800 capable too.