Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Pixeling > Graphics on C64 demoscene: Guide of Ethics – a Proposal
2023-12-22 18:03
Sander

Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 496
Graphics on C64 demoscene: Guide of Ethics – a Proposal

Dear fellow sceners,

This is an attempt to get more understanding among, and for, C64 demoscene pixel artists. It’s not written to limit anyone, but a prayer for more transparency.

Read the document here: ->Graphics on C64 demoscene: Guide of Ethics – a Proposal<-

We tried to give define and value different processes. Which is a result of discussion, where we saw mutual grounds and felt the need to write these down.
We will update the document periodically, when enough input has been gathered and sorted out.

We’d really love to hear your thoughts on the subjects in the document.
Please post them in this thread.

(Personally I will not always fully comply to these guidelines myself, but I will continue to be transparant about it. However, I do agree with the values communicated in this document.)
 
... 137 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2023-12-29 15:26
CreaMD

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3057
Quote: There is one simple fact we need to face:

We are all getting obsolete quickly.

No amount of petitions will change that. So have fun while you still can.


Although technology and art forms may change over time, certain pieces of art will continue to be valued and remembered. This could be due to their unique expression, emotional impact, historical significance, or a combination of these factors. Even as artists and the tools they use become obsolete, their art can live on and maintain its relevance and value to future generations.
2023-12-29 16:26
Mixer

Registered: Apr 2008
Posts: 452
Perhaps there should be a general discussion thread about this new hammer we've got to play with.
2023-12-29 23:52
arch0N

Registered: May 2006
Posts: 12
Technology is simply a tool; it needs someone to operate it. AI won’t replace you, but someone who knows how to use it might.

I respect the desire to remain true to pixel art, but just as photography didn’t eliminate the artist, AI is here to stay and will continue to improve. If you avoid using AI, photo references, stock images, or anything that comes to mind, you might be making your work more difficult. I’m not suggesting that simply entering a prompt into Midjourney is enough - actually, the more detailed you are with your prompt, the more the results might stray from what you envisioned. It’s just a tool, after all.

Rob Hubbard’s statement “Mutate or Die” from his speech at 10:25 comes to mind:

https://youtu.be/rSDz7x5UVIc?si=W-YE_tJHkJzpTKtd.
2023-12-30 01:23
PAL

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 292
arch0N: cool post
2023-12-30 03:39
acrouzet

Registered: May 2020
Posts: 97
In the end, do what's most fulfilling to YOU, and surely there will be people who appreciate it.
2023-12-30 09:25
arch0N

Registered: May 2006
Posts: 12
Quote: arch0N: cool post

Thanks Man and great post of yours #10, fully agree there.
2023-12-30 10:18
4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285
Quote:
Technology is simply a tool

While this claim makes sense when put together with the rest of the sentence, as it was made to show that technology is dependent on human operator, I just want to point out that on its own, this claim is dead wrong. In context of your post = right, on its own = dead wrong.
What you’re saying is very defetistic, you’re basically saying: if you are a charcoal drawing artist and they invent a charcoal drawing machine, you should better quickly learn how to oil and service this machine, as this will be your job from now on. Mutate or die. It’s very defetistic and perhaps very true.
But why are we philosophizing about “AI” here, let’s get back to the conversation about the paper.
2023-12-30 11:17
Hein

Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 954
Quoting 4gentE
Quote:
Technology is simply a tool

While this claim makes sense when put together with the rest of the sentence, as it was made to show that technology is dependent on human operator, I just want to point out that on its own, this claim is dead wrong. In context of your post = right, on its own = dead wrong.
What you’re saying is very defetistic, you’re basically saying: if you are a charcoal drawing artist and they invent a charcoal drawing machine, you should better quickly learn how to oil and service this machine, as this will be your job from now on. Mutate or die. It’s very defetistic and perhaps very true.
But why are we philosophizing about “AI” here, let’s get back to the conversation about the paper.

Or, if you're an oil painter, you can use an iPad with Procreate (as a tool) and mimic oil paint.

But adaptation seems a good strategy indeed if you want to be ahead of the curve.
2023-12-30 11:30
4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 285
Quote:
Or, if you're an oil painter, you can use an iPad with Procreate (as a tool) and mimic oil paint.

Or you can use an iPad with or without Procreate as a literal tool for applying paint to the canvas. ;)
2023-12-30 11:31
Hein

Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 954
Quoting 4gentE
Quote:
Or, if you're an oil painter, you can use an iPad with Procreate (as a tool) and mimic oil paint.

Or you can use an iPad with or without Procreate as a literal tool for applying paint to the canvas. ;)

Even better!
Previous - 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
MaD ][/Starship
MWR/Visdom
Chesser/Blazon
t0m3000/hf^boom!^ibx
sailor/Triad
Warlord
Jamais
Airwolf/F4CG
Guests online: 311
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.7)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
7 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 No Listen  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.6)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Triad  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Musicians
1 Rob Hubbard  (9.7)
2 Mutetus  (9.7)
3 Jeroen Tel  (9.7)
4 Linus  (9.6)
5 Stinsen  (9.6)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.061 sec.