| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
The opened outline - DISCUSS!
"The opened outline is able to capture something of our secret thoughts and its permutative behaviour. We can recognize an item here and there but the line always glides further with unlimited combination of associations. Curves of the consiousness, curves of the subconcious." |
|
... 10 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 1989 |
In retrospect I kind of agree, well, to a certain degree at least. You see, one has to differentiate between the hidden and the visible, thus can the outline be taken quite literally. It really boils down to three things:
1) The viewer (in the normal sence)
2) The perspective
3) The distance
Once you give it a thought it actually becomes quite crystal clear! Given the amount of time some people spend thinking on this I find it quite astounding that they can't make that final small mind leap, it's not really THAT hard.
Tilt your head, say no! and just swallow the hard facts.
|
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
You all suck (according to this video)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQB9s72Y6iA |
| |
Ed
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 173 |
@Ffffuuubird: "Videoklippet har tagits bort på grund av brott mot användarvillkoren." :) |
| |
Crimson
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 6 |
@Twoflower:
Originally the comment was purposed for
September-Summer
Oswald and Jailbird have reused it for fun.
@Sander: thx |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
Liar! I wrote that!
And meanwhile we're at it, the characteristic theme of Geoffreys model of subsemioticist modern outline theory is not, in fact, situationism, but neosituationism. Debord suggests the use of capitalist discourse to attack truth. Therefore, Lacan uses the term the prepatriarchial paradigm of outline consensus to denote the failure, and eventually the absurdity, of capitalist society.
In the works of Fellini, a predominant concept is the distinction between within and without. Scuglia suggests that we have to choose between Sontagist outline and the postsemiotic paradigm of screen dumps (yes). But the subject is contextualised into a that includes art as a paradox.
|
| |
Crimson
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 6 |
Ffffuuubird: :D
|
| |
Stainless Steel
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966 |
Oh Arnold,
If one examines postcapitalist dialectic screenshots (YES!), one is faced with a choice:
either accept patriarchialist deconstructivism or conclude that the screendump is part of the failure of culture.
In a sense, Marx suggests the use of postcapitalist dialectic screenshots to attack class. Foucaults critique of precultural Marxism holds that consensus is created by the masses.
Obviously.
|
| |
Steppe
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510 |
Stating the obvious in 2009 again, you two... |
| |
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829 |
Wake me up when it's over. |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1576 |
Will make sure of that, Sir Buzz Killington. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
