| |
Matt
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 601 |
C64 notemakers
dunno if this has been discussed/requested before but I'd love to see C64 notemakers have their own category and not just being stored under C64 tools.
what do you think? |
|
... 1 post hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
SIDWAVE
Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2238 |
I agree, category for ALL |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11523 |
yeah, an ALL cathegory would rule! finally no more pointless discussions =P |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5127 |
t a g s |
| |
Matt
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 601 |
that's what I mean, it should be included in advanced search.
it's not like there's only a couple of notewriters out there, there must be a least a couple of hundreds, or so.
so what do you think? Perff? |
| |
Stirf
Account closed
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 26 |
anyone got a disk (.d64) with lots of character-sets to use? |
| |
V-12
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 207 |
Notemaker is in fact a tool, but special feature using tags would be a great idea :)
Maybe C64 Tool as main genre, but next choosable subgenre called Notemaker :) |
| |
NecroPolo
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 232 |
Yeppah. Using tags is a great idea. |
| |
Richard
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 621 |
Quote: anyone got a disk (.d64) with lots of character-sets to use?
Here's a few disks with charsets (Charset collections) you can try. Make sure you have a blank disk for saving those fonts if you need to.
99 Charsets V2.0 by Network
FontTime by Unreal
Charsets collection by Equinoxe
64 Chars by Mace
Char Disk #1 by The Meatball
Char Collection #1 by The Dark Realm
Should be enough there for you matey :)
|
| |
Stirf
Account closed
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 26 |
thanks!!
hope there is a multicolour amongst these.
really nice!
thanks again!!
stirf/role |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 679 |
I think its nicer to use the AKA field instead of tags for advanced searched.
If the notemaker's name is "dashit++" you can use "uber notemaker" as aka field it would turn up in search.
Tags are nice but as long as people dont even enter minimal info to entries I think tags would be misleading... |
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
