Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Entries > Release id #244483 : Oceanborn
2024-07-23 23:36
Raistlin

Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 622
Release id #244483 : Oceanborn

TheRyk mentions here that this pic being animated makes it a one file demo. Is that definitely the case for all GFX? I’ve seen many animations on CSDb that were tagged as gfx but which included simple animations.

What’s the definition for whether a graphic is “animated”?
 
... 21 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2024-07-24 19:41
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11281
If whatever classification on csdb affects what you "can do" then you are doing it wrong in the first place.

And yes, certain rules may not make sense. However as long as no rules exist things make even less sense. (And adding credits to rob hubbard to all and everything that uses hubbard tunes will never make sense for that matter).
2024-07-25 02:05
Raistlin

Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 622
GPZ: in the absence of “rules”, there’s still common sense. The scene doesn’t need rules for something as simple as deciding whether a release is made to show off effects, graphics or music.

What next? Reclassify cracks as demos because they feature an intro on the front? It’s not just a game any more, after all, and often the intro is more interesting than the game itself?

Or, as I say, we simply use common sense.
2024-07-25 11:24
Jetboy

Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 265
Quoting Raistlin
GPZ: in the absence of “rules”, there’s still common sense.


There is no common sense, everyone has one's own.

Some have more than one, especially here on CSDB.
2024-07-25 18:10
Burglar

Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1066
Quoting Raistlin
GPZ: in the absence of “rules”, there’s still common sense. The scene doesn’t need rules for something as simple as deciding whether a release is made to show off effects, graphics or music.

What next? Reclassify cracks as demos because they feature an intro on the front? It’s not just a game any more, after all, and often the intro is more interesting than the game itself?

Or, as I say, we simply use common sense.
+1 from me :)
2024-07-25 18:36
Frantic

Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1641
In line with the common sense remarks, I would say the concepts of the scene are better understood in terms of family resemblance than as a matter of strict formal categories. From that point of view it is not strange at all if it is a bit tricky to come up with a list of necessary and/or sufficient conditions to define each of the categories.

In fact, I find it fascinating to what a large extent a simple scheme of classification (demos, cracks, etc) actually works to classify the vaaaast majority of all those thousands and thousands of releases that are entered into CSDb. It kind of illustrates to what a large extent people — a lot of people — have oriented themselves towards a few relatively intuitively graspable categories over the years, in many many instances, in such a strikingly orderly fashion.
2024-07-25 23:23
DKT

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 99
For me, the classification of the demo is quite simple (for the case when it's released out of any compo). This production should be classified as a demo or intro. If anything moves on the screen (and it's not an equalizer), it's already a demo or intro.
2024-07-26 00:40
Flex

Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 107
What Raistlin (& others) said.
2024-07-26 01:56
Raistlin

Registered: Mar 2007
Posts: 622
“If something moves on the screen it’s already a demo or an intro”

It’s going to take a while to reclassify all those interlace FLI pics to be intros…
2024-07-26 07:52
4gentE

Registered: Mar 2021
Posts: 178
Perhaps then, every executable that's not a game or a crack is a demo or an intro? Just reading what I just wrote feels bizarre. I strongly suspect this inconsistency situation is unresolvable. Without curtailing authors that is. And it's been (rightly) said above that if a database of artifacts' classification system curtails past present and future authors, it' broken.
2024-07-26 09:50
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11281
Quote:
GPZ: in the absence of “rules”, there’s still common sense.

The problem with common sense is that it isn't quite common. And that is why rules are strictly required for this sort of thing - as demonstrated by the countless never ending discussions about this "common sense".

And if you can't come up with a simple rule according to your common sense - it doesn't make a lot of sense either to be begin with.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
csabanw
Airwolf/F4CG
Guests online: 112
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Coma Light 13  (9.7)
4 Mojo  (9.7)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 3SIRA  (9.6)
7 Uncensored  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 No Bounds  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
6 It's More Fun to Com..  (9.5)
7 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Quadrants  (9.5)
10 Daah, Those Acid Pil..  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Booze Design  (9.3)
2 Oxyron  (9.3)
3 Nostalgia  (9.3)
4 Censor Design  (9.3)
5 Triad  (9.2)
Top Fullscreen Graphicians
1 Joe  (9.7)
2 Veto  (9.6)
3 Facet  (9.6)
4 The Sarge  (9.6)
5 Carrion  (9.5)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.052 sec.