| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1381 |
Assembler preferences.
Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?
I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.
(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects) |
|
... 204 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Axis/Oxyron
Registered: Apr 2007
Posts: 91 |
Dreamass |
| |
Mr. SID
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 422 |
Only fools would not use k2asm, and I'm not one. :) |
| |
Murphy
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 10 |
KickAssembler |
| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
KickAss |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 293 |
Useful addition to current discussion would be explanation why particular assembler is being used IMHO. |
| |
Pantaloon
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 124 |
AlexC, don't go there :) |
| |
Peiselulli
Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 81 |
ACME - because if I miss a feature or find a bug, I can write to the developer directly to fix it in a new version very fast ;-)
And I'm too lazy to build my own. |
| |
Karmic
Registered: Apr 2015
Posts: 66 |
Peiselulli: What, ACME is still being developed? :) |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 293 |
Quote: AlexC, don't go there :)
Sorry - I know I'm stepping on very thin ice but I can't resist ;) |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 628 |
Crossbow would write SMON |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 22 - Next |
