| |
spider-j
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 446 |
Event id #2985 : Filterless $21 Compo 2020
What is this? Count me in! |
|
... 76 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
spider-j
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 446 |
Quoting Eric DobekOk, just to clear up things, testbit will not be allowed.
*thumbsup* What about 0 waveform? |
| |
Mibri
Registered: Feb 2018
Posts: 200 |
So basically, wave-wise, we’re allowed $20, $21, $22, and $23. Got it. :) |
| |
Eric Dobek
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2020
Posts: 18 |
Yep. Again, if you have any more questions about this compo, send a message here or PM me, whatever works for you. |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
Quoting spider-j*thumbsup* What about 0 waveform?
READ GODDAMN RULES AT COMPO PAGE! |
| |
F7sus4
Registered: Apr 2013
Posts: 112 |
Quote: Quoting spider-j*thumbsup* What about 0 waveform?
READ GODDAMN RULES AT COMPO PAGE!
Using current compo rules, $00 waveform is allowed for the purpose of hard-restart routine and therefore, it falls under the same issue as test-bit did. I assume it requires additional clarification. |
| |
spider-j
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 446 |
Quoting Jammer
READ GODDAMN RULES AT COMPO PAGE!
?!? Eric just added a comment about that. How would I've been able to read that already in the past before the comment was added? ;-) |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
I assumed you've figured out that if initial rules stated no testbit or zero wave outside HR and Eric changed testbit not to be used whatsoever, it automatically applies for zero wave as well, doesn't it? ;) |
| |
F7sus4
Registered: Apr 2013
Posts: 112 |
Quote: I assumed you've figured out that if initial rules stated no testbit or zero wave outside HR and Eric changed testbit not to be used whatsoever, it automatically applies for zero wave as well, doesn't it? ;)
Assumptions are bad and lead to unfounded conclusions, because logic, m'kay.
It's just the test-bit that became prohibited, but not $00 during "hard-restart routines". I'd advocate for prohibiting $00 as well, for the very same reasons as test-bit. |
| |
spider-j
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 446 |
Quoting JammerI assumed you've figured out that if initial rules stated no testbit or zero wave outside HR and Eric changed testbit not to be used whatsoever, it automatically applies for zero wave as well, doesn't it? ;)
No it doesn't. Upper nibble = waveform, lower nibble = gate-bit, test-bit etc... The rules when I wrote my question were just about the lower nibble (testbit). So $01 would have been a valid HR waveform.
Anyway, HR isn't allowed anymore – and yep, I get that this also includes the upper nibble now. And that means we can't use GoatTracker at all... |
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1289 |
'No testbit or zero waveform allowed outside routine's hardrestart phase' stated by initial rules
zero waveform means 4 upper bits disabled in whatever combination with 4 lower bits |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 - Next |
