| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
C64 Codebase
Hello!
It was a while ago now that C64 Codebase Wiki opened its doors. I would just like to encourage good coders sympathetic with this project to actually add some code there. This is important in order to keep the quality of the site. I feel that the quality is somehow fading a little with the stuff that has been added during the last 6 months, to generalize a little.
If you are a decent coder: Just think for a moment about all those sources that you have lying around on your C64 disks and PC harddrives. Codebase needs you!
http://codebase64.org/doku.php
If someone feel like donating some cool stuff, I could use that as prices in some kind of add-good-stuff-to-codebase-competition or so.
A good codebase is a good base for the future C64 scene! ;)
|
|
... 127 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
Hello!
I noticed the problem today (reported by Richard). I will try to have a look at it this evening. In any case, it won't be dysfunctional for long.
//FTC |
| |
Stainless Steel
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 966 |
Ive got the Sourcecode for my last two favorites plus intros. its nothing fancy and the code is probably pretty messy. Should i consider adding it or rather not? |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
if you ask me I'd prefer articles over messy uncommented sources. or sources of useful short commented routines |
| |
Devia
Registered: Oct 2004
Posts: 401 |
Yeah.. sources where you have to do single-stepping and cycle counting in your head to figure out why some stuff actually works are no better that disassembling the stuff yourself, imho.
|
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
I agree with the previous two posters. I think, minimally, if a piece of code is not integrated in an article text, it would at least have to be quite well structured and commented. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
The website is called 'Codebase' not 'Source dump'.
Also, people should add what assembler they use.
[edit 1]
Oh, and I find the website rather unstructured, information wise. Too much information on some pages, too little categorised.
But hey... let's first gather and then sort later ;-)
[edit 2]
BTW, wouldn't it be nice to have some semi-code to introduce the real code?
The real code sometimes is so big, it's hard to get your head around it. A simple little paragraph that describes the principle would be a nice introduction... |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
yeah...
main sections should be like this:
6510
VICII (irq timing etc should be here from hw setup)
SID
6526
I/O
Game coding
Demo coding
Cracking
Math & Algos
Emulators
OS coding (kernal&basic rom..)
Third Party Hardware (Hardware setup and detection moved to related chips)
Math operations sourcecode should be splitted to div/mul/sqrt/trig
6510 coding should be:
- cpu related
- adressing modes
- instruction set in details
- cycle table from graham's page
- illegals
- timings pinout, etc
- general routines
- ...
etc. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
i dont know but.... it's a wiki you know. its pointless to dump here how you think it should be ... |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
I agree that the site needs a bit more structure. Groepaz is right in general, but even though I mainly provide the site and not its contents I would like to maintain some control over the general site structure. I think Oswalds suggestions are all good. If nobody disagrees with them, I will do something like that shortly.
I had a quick look into the permissions issue now and while I still don't know exactly what caused the problem, I have at least fixed the problem itself. If the permission problems appear again, please tell me.
Thank you all for providing thoughts and bug reports on the wiki. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094 |
Quote: i dont know but.... it's a wiki you know. its pointless to dump here how you think it should be ...
the reason is we had disagreed on this with frantic earlier, so I just suggested before making changes also iirc frantic kept the rights of editing the main structures. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 - Next |
