| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 5094 |
Trusted people to do CSDb Development
There have been many feature requests and zero response and changes. Why is CSDb so hostile with the users and why cant someone take over Perff's job and do some development from time to time ? Whats happening behind the scenes ? |
|
... 13 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
Count Zero
Registered: Jan 2003 Posts: 1932 |
ian :)
Why even trusted people? Let just push the donate button hard and hire some russian lowlifes. Code review is much easier than making it all up again :) |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004 Posts: 1098 |
I dont think Perff wants help. and/or he's too scared to share the csdb codebase with others. I've only seen one feature added in the last 5 years (bbses) and that's it.
so its simple, csdb will remain uber slow with a crap interface.
its a shame really |
| |
Conjuror
Registered: Aug 2004 Posts: 168 |
Has anyone written up a specification?
First step would be to define what would be involved to see just how big a task this would be (quite large I would suspect)
|
| |
SIDWAVE Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 2238 |
"If you build it, they will come.." |
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002 Posts: 2014 |
Then there's the thing with integrity, censored statements and what not, available in the database only to Perff... I was once thinking thay maybe a public raw read only access of the whole db would perhaps spawn a CSDb 2 but I think it's naive nowadays... |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 5094 |
I'm not talking of CSDb v2, but maybe it would be nice to have some of these implemented:
- comments, summaries, goofs, etc all on one page
- email on pm
- pm preview
- etc. |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002 Posts: 1799 |
We could also approach CSDb the way we do the C64: get as much as possible out of it without changing it. |
| |
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 5094 |
or we could just lie down and wait for death. |
| |
SIDWAVE Account closed
Registered: Apr 2002 Posts: 2238 |
Quote: We could also approach CSDb the way we do the C64: get as much as possible out of it without changing it.
Says a man who codes demos for c64 in an emu with a cross assembler, and has a retro replay cartridge and other fancy modern hardware for the c64..
(not specifically you mace, but could be anybody)
It comes by itself, one day people will be so tired of the old systems, that they will make new ones.. |
| |
JCB Account closed
Registered: Jun 2002 Posts: 241 |
It kind of all depends on how the current stuff is coded. I'd hate to offer to help only to be thrown into a big bowl of spaghetti ;)
eg changing what's displayed as default on a release's page "should" be really easy, as should email on PM..
|
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |