| |
The Shadow
Registered: Oct 2007
Posts: 304 |
Repeal Anonymous Voting
Anonymous voting allows cowards to abuse the voting system. People downvote like sneaky little bastards. If you are voting for a person, group or release and you feel that your particular vote is how you honestly feel then there is no reason to conceal your vote. Repealing anonymous voting would weed out a large portion of the downvoters. |
|
... 137 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359 |
i dont think any of the admins is against anonymous voting :) (the only admin is perff btw, but the moderators share that opinion for the most part) |
| |
celticdesign
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 149 |
are elections anonymous? ;-)
my solution for the TOP ranking is: list/allow only entries with over 100 votes... for compos's -> don't care!!! |
| |
jailbird
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578 |
Whatever.
It always seemed that you guys have more vote-weight on changes in the site's main functionalities than Perff, the absolute majority of those who fill up this place with new stuff, and those who kept suggesting very useful changes for years, combined; anyway.
Which is just baffling, plain disgusting, and is the reason why I lately avoid CSDb like plague.
So just enjoy your little self-esteem improvenet bubble. I'm outta here.
Please disable my account. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359 |
Quote:my solution for the TOP ranking is: list/allow only entries with over 100 votes...
i'd make it so no result is shown ever, unless 100 votes. that pretty much solves every problem discussed here. at least for the 3 entries that would get enough votes =) |
| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
Quoting JailbirdAs long as some of the more influental CSDb admins are against anonymous voting, nothing at all will change considering this topic. The more influential "admins" of East Germany were against tearing down the Berlin Wall too, but that still happened in the end due to public pressure. So things can change, even though the powers that be might be against it. |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 248 |
I doubt the admins here will improve The votingsystem, they just do Not care enough it seems. It could be so easy to make a more fair System. . |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11359 |
fair means: it equally sucks for everyone. we are quite there =)
and as much as some people would like it, the one and only one who could change this is perff. the moderators (again: not admins) cant not ever do anything about it at all. (and they are not supposed to do it either)
but you are correct, most of them dont give a shit. maybe if every other issue of this website has been solved, then i might bother thinking about how to convince perff to "better" the voting crap =P |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 248 |
then perff does not care enough...
|
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 2014 |
Lot's of complaints... I would like to that Perff and the moderators for maintaining this site (which is quite essential for the C64 scene to survive at all) on their spare time. Thank you for that!
Then I agree that there are probably betters ways to handle a voting system with few participants than the current, but I have to agree with Groepaz: There are other things that might need attention first and given the very little "free" time adults have nowadays it's a serious matter of prioritizing your time, and honesty I agree that the voting system has to come low. The recent fixes for forum-width using the CSS-wrap stuff and the csdb.dk redirection was much more needed fixes. |
| |
Peacemaker
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 248 |
well. give out the source, hire an php coder. i guess there a lot of people who could improve things here for free ;)
|
| Previous - 1 | ... | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 - Next |
