Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > C64 Coding > Assembler preferences.
2016-02-09 06:03
ChristopherJam

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1424
Assembler preferences.

Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?

I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.


(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects)
 
... 204 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2016-02-09 18:06
TheRyk

Registered: Mar 2009
Posts: 2475
Quote: Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?

I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.


(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects)


- ACME
- larger productions: makes things easier if everyone uses the same, but normally someone experienced enough to code for such a production is also skilled enough to press CTRL+H and adjust syntax, e.g. from KickAss to ACME, has become even easier since ACME also accepts +/++/+++/-/--/--- labels
2016-02-09 18:09
ChristopherJam

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1424
Quote: DreamAss and Emacs, but.. Haven't we had this "discussion" already?

Eh, not that recently. Was wondering what current practices are, and the "Coding on a PC for the 64?" thread is way broader in scope than the two questions above.

(and oi, no text editor wars under this topic please!)
2016-02-09 18:17
soci

Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 486
64tass, for a long time now.
2016-02-09 19:02
Fungus

Registered: Sep 2002
Posts: 750
64tass
2016-02-09 19:10
DKT

Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 102
I'm Acme user.

So, the results are (up to now):
1st) ACME (37%)
2nd) 64tass (26%)
3rd) KickAssembler and ca65 (11%)

;-)
2016-02-09 19:15
MagerValp

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1082
ca65
2016-02-09 19:16
4mat

Registered: May 2010
Posts: 66
Dasm
2016-02-09 20:29
Digger

Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 448
KickAss only :]
2016-02-09 20:30
AlexC

Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 302
Quoting Slammer

Bitbreaker: If there are features that would make integration easier, feel free to add it to the wishlist. Its in the RetroAssembler group.


Even my love for asm will not make me to join FB. Do we really need to discuss assembly language using Facebook? ;-p
2016-02-09 22:33
enthusi

Registered: May 2004
Posts: 679
xa (floodgap). used to be acme before
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 22 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
yaruni
Guests online: 107
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Codeboys & Endians  (9.7)
4 Mojo  (9.6)
5 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
6 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
7 Signal Carnival  (9.6)
8 Wonderland XIV  (9.5)
9 Uncensored  (9.5)
10 Comaland 100%  (9.5)
Top onefile Demos
1 Nine  (9.7)
2 Layers  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
5 Copper Booze  (9.5)
6 Scan and Spin  (9.5)
7 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
8 Grey  (9.5)
9 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
10 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Artline Designs  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Performers  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top NTSC-Fixers
1 Pudwerx  (10)
2 Stormbringer  (9.7)
3 Fungus  (9.6)
4 Booze  (9.5)
5 Grim Reaper  (9.3)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2025
Page generated in: 0.138 sec.