| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004 Posts: 1409 |
Assembler preferences.
Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?
I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.
(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects) |
|
... 204 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts.... |
| |
TheRyk
Registered: Mar 2009 Posts: 2244 |
Quote: Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?
I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.
(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects)
- ACME
- larger productions: makes things easier if everyone uses the same, but normally someone experienced enough to code for such a production is also skilled enough to press CTRL+H and adjust syntax, e.g. from KickAss to ACME, has become even easier since ACME also accepts +/++/+++/-/--/--- labels |
| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004 Posts: 1409 |
Quote: DreamAss and Emacs, but.. Haven't we had this "discussion" already?
Eh, not that recently. Was wondering what current practices are, and the "Coding on a PC for the 64?" thread is way broader in scope than the two questions above.
(and oi, no text editor wars under this topic please!) |
| |
soci
Registered: Sep 2003 Posts: 480 |
64tass, for a long time now. |
| |
Fungus
Registered: Sep 2002 Posts: 686 |
64tass |
| |
DKT
Registered: Aug 2004 Posts: 99 |
I'm Acme user.
So, the results are (up to now):
1st) ACME (37%)
2nd) 64tass (26%)
3rd) KickAssembler and ca65 (11%)
;-) |
| |
MagerValp
Registered: Dec 2001 Posts: 1078 |
ca65 |
| |
4mat
Registered: May 2010 Posts: 66 |
Dasm |
| |
Digger
Registered: Mar 2005 Posts: 437 |
KickAss only :] |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008 Posts: 299 |
Quoting Slammer
Bitbreaker: If there are features that would make integration easier, feel free to add it to the wishlist. Its in the RetroAssembler group.
Even my love for asm will not make me to join FB. Do we really need to discuss assembly language using Facebook? ;-p |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004 Posts: 677 |
xa (floodgap). used to be acme before |
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 22 - Next |