| |
ChristopherJam
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 1409 |
Assembler preferences.
Two questions:
- what's everyone using these days?
- on large productions, do groups tend to enforce a single assembler for the entire project, or is the code base a bit heterogenous?
I'd like to keep this discussion purely focussed on assemblers; please leave code generators, loader toolchains etc for that other thread.
(as for me, I'm still using xa65 for most projects) |
|
... 204 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
DKT
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 99 |
I'm Acme user.
So, the results are (up to now):
1st) ACME (37%)
2nd) 64tass (26%)
3rd) KickAssembler and ca65 (11%)
;-) |
| |
MagerValp
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1078 |
ca65 |
| |
4mat
Registered: May 2010
Posts: 66 |
Dasm |
| |
Digger
Registered: Mar 2005
Posts: 437 |
KickAss only :] |
| |
AlexC
Registered: Jan 2008
Posts: 299 |
Quoting Slammer
Bitbreaker: If there are features that would make integration easier, feel free to add it to the wishlist. Its in the RetroAssembler group.
Even my love for asm will not make me to join FB. Do we really need to discuss assembly language using Facebook? ;-p |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
xa (floodgap). used to be acme before |
| |
Ksubi
Account closed
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 87 |
64tass |
| |
Fix
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 54 |
Acme since it's fast and easy to use...
For more complex stuff I'm looking into CA65 environment. |
| |
Compyx
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 631 |
Dreamass, but since that one doesn't seem to be actively maintained anymore, I'm looking into 64tass.
I agree with HCL here: we've had a similar thread recently on development environments, just ignore the text editors, Makefile's and scripts and you're left with a huge list of assemblers people tend to use ;) |
| |
Perplex
Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 255 |
Assembler? I thought everyone entered the code as DATA statements? (cue Four Yorkshiremen...) |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 22 - Next |
