| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
Clever Routines
Post your unreleased clever routines here...
|
|
... 124 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
Nice to see that my unserious thread has developed into something useful. :) I would definitely upload some sources to a codebase/wiki. |
| |
Jayce
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 39 |
Quote: Are we talking about a general C64 wiki now, or the original clever routines thing (in wiki form)? If it is still restricted to the latter, I can maintain it, if ppl won't get übermad at me for not having 100% time and full attention 24 hours a day.
I think it would be better just to concentrate on the coding part instead of a global C64 knowledge base. There is already enough information to be found about C64's and the scene on the internet. However a good and centralized wiki about C64 coding, vic/sid trickery etc is very welcome i think.
I would contribute some stuff for sure, not that i have that much to contribute but i really like the idea of creating a common library of routine's and the explanation of how that routine works.
|
| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
Quote: Raf, now that looks like a good base for starting up. is there a way to store those code templates in a tree structure? like c64 programming-> vic -> interrupts -> stable irq. what we would really need is a wiki like engine. maybe Perff can setup and host one on the server where csdb is running?
Agree, and there should also be some meta info for each routine, like description, what assembler to use, etc.
|
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
Exactly... Some meta information would be required. (Perhaps even some simple automatic conversion between source formats, but that would be a later issue. First prio would be to get it up and running at all.) I can manage such a site without problems. In fact, I am not sure a wiki is needed for that purpose even, but some webspace and a URL would be nice if someone can supply that at least. I could do some PHP scripts for source uploading. (But I guess I could use something like http://bfp.c64.org/coding too, if ppl wouldn't mind such an URL.)
Perhaps I could just do it like this:
- A form to upload new sources. One assings them a cateogory (either an existing one, or one creates a new category) and a name and some info on what assembler to use.
- People who want to improve some of the sources can do so by getting a username/password and logging in and just modify it. (Adding comments, optimizing some code, or whatever.)
I would then moderate this site as appropriate. For example if ppl start to create senseless categories I could make it a bit more structured and so on. I don't think a forum would be needed. Perhaps the coding forum here at CSDb is more appropriate for that?
That would be a pretty good start, wouldn't it?
//FTC
|
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
(Btw.. I started to work on that site now. I guess it's best just to get it done...) |
| |
Trash
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 122 |
Quote: per rasterline? Where?
On Tour is my contrbution to where you can find a dysp using that technique..
|
| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570 |
Quote: On Tour is my contrbution to where you can find a dysp using that technique..
Yes, nice...but now the commented sourcecode + tech details because that's the site in making is all about. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
The site currently looks like this:
http://bfp.c64.org/code64/
Feel free to try it out a little if you want to, but be aware that there is a lot of bugs in there so don't expect it to do what it is supposed to do yet. (Press the logo to get back to the file browser for now.. I'll change that of course.) I concentrated on the php coding for now, so the useability has to be worked on a lot too. However, at least you have some first stumbling steps to give feedback on now.. |
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 2014 |
It looks really nice Frantic, however what I don't like about this solution is that the ability to write articles with text and code interleaved has been lost. That's why I liked the wiki approach. Of course one can write articles in the source code but it's kinda sucky. Full support for wiki articles would be nice, i.e. the complete support for bbcodes.
|
| |
Jayce
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 39 |
I have to agree with jackasser on this, why developing something new yourself when all it really takes is just installing mediawiki on a server? This surely looks nice, but forgive my rudeness, this is a typical example of design over functional use. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 - Next |
