Log inRegister an accountBrowse CSDbHelp & documentationFacts & StatisticsThe forumsAvailable RSS-feeds on CSDbSupport CSDb Commodore 64 Scene Database
 Welcome to our latest new user danikAdmiral ! (Registered 2024-12-17) You are not logged in - nap
CSDb User Forums


Forums > CSDb Feedback > Tags (yet again)
2012-03-10 10:22
jailbird

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1578
Tags (yet again)

It is still unbeknownst to me why tags weren't implemented yet, or why are some so stubbornly against it. This portal is almost completely based on IMDb, and tags are one of the most useful features on that site.

Just a few of the useful features it would bring:

- finding demos containing an effect, record, theme...
- finding musics with a specific style, instrument, musical technique...
- finding images with a certain motive, character, technique, color-sceme...
- finding a specific usage of a tool/utility
- finding a magazine with an article about XY
- etc. etc...

It wouldn't take more than an hour to implement: another textbox on the "add comments" page with the Tags label (separated with commas) -> parsing the field and popping it out on the profile-page (as links, so if I'd click on a tag, I'd be redirected to a search-results page with a list of all those products where the same or similar tag was present).

Of course it wouldn't work right away, populating would certainly take some time. Just as everything else on this site.

Any thoughts? And in case of another instant rejection, I'd definitely love to get a bit more reasonable answer than the usual "I don't think we need it. Oh, and look here's my middle finger too. thxbai"
 
... 64 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
 
2012-03-11 15:29
JackAsser

Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 2014
There are no cons. Period.
2012-03-11 16:45
Mr. SID

Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 424
There's just no argument against tags. They're a common household item these days.
2012-03-11 17:59
Sixx

Registered: May 2005
Posts: 229
I tag along aswell.

//\\
\\
\\
/// (<-- TAG)
2012-03-11 18:27
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384
Quote:
but you often seem to completely forget that the site is actually based on hundreds, if not thousands of people

you are a bit naive there. 99% of the work here is done by about 1% of the csdb users. (you know who you are)

and thats why unless *these* users speak up, there is little chance for tags (or anything else really) turn into something useful. and thats why i am against it - i'd rather spend my time on supporting this handful users that actually does something useful. (one of them already spoke up - not to your consent however)
2012-03-11 18:45
STE'86

Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 274
but adding tags can't actually fail to be useful that's the point.

if nobody does anything with them, you are no worse off.

if ONE person does, you are better off than you started.

and so far SEVERAL people with a fair few releases between them have volunteered to tag their own and others stuff.

therefore CSDB is GUARANTEED to be better off already.

on to another negative point please this one has been busted.
2012-03-11 19:12
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384
ah, another volunteer that will supervise and clean up the tags!

if you think adding a feature like this does not result in more work for the maintainers and moderators, because all it could possibly do is positive, then you are really more than naive.

"SEVERAL people with a fair few releases between them have volunteered to tag their own and others stuff."
and if you think any of them belongs to these 1% that actually do the bulk of work here, then you are also very naive.
2012-03-11 19:31
STE'86

Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 274
well if you don't like doing the "work" you can always turn in your mod status!

and on from that happy thought...

exactly WHY would would tags need to be policed?




2012-03-11 19:31
JCB
Account closed

Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 241
I volunteer to supervise and clean up the tags too.

Next excuse?
2012-03-11 19:36
Cruzer

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048
We are the 99%. Occupy CSDb! :)
2012-03-11 19:38
chatGPZ

Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384
Quote:
well if you don't like doing the "work" you can always turn in your mod status!

if you want a site with tags, make your own! yay! great arguments you got there.
Quote:
exactly WHY would would tags need to be policed?

because idiots will be idiots and act like idiots. again: if you think this will only do good and cause no extra work, you are very naive.
Quote:
I volunteer to supervise and clean up the tags too.

i could take this kind of comment seriously if it came from a person that spent any amount of time worth mentioning on the database. next.
Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 - Next
RefreshSubscribe to this thread:

You need to be logged in to post in the forum.

Search the forum:
Search   for   in  
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
Advanced
Users Online
Mason/Unicess
Core/VPN
pcollins/Quantum
Flex/Artline Designs
bexxx
Skylab/The Movers
krissz
Knut Clausen/SHAPE/F..
Guests online: 97
Top Demos
1 Next Level  (9.7)
2 13:37  (9.7)
3 Mojo  (9.6)
4 Coma Light 13  (9.6)
5 Edge of Disgrace  (9.6)
6 What Is The Matrix 2  (9.6)
7 The Demo Coder  (9.6)
8 Uncensored  (9.6)
9 Comaland 100%  (9.6)
10 Wonderland XIV  (9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1 Layers  (9.6)
2 Party Elk 2  (9.6)
3 Cubic Dream  (9.6)
4 Copper Booze  (9.6)
5 No Listen  (9.6)
6 Rainbow Connection  (9.5)
7 Dawnfall V1.1  (9.5)
8 Onscreen 5k  (9.5)
9 Morph  (9.5)
10 Libertongo  (9.5)
Top Groups
1 Performers  (9.3)
2 Booze Design  (9.3)
3 Oxyron  (9.3)
4 Triad  (9.3)
5 Censor Design  (9.3)
Top Organizers
1 Burglar  (9.9)
2 Sixx  (9.8)
3 hedning  (9.7)
4 Irata  (9.7)
5 Tim  (9.7)

Home - Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.049 sec.