| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1101 |
Event id #1610 : X 2010
The date is final: 1,2,3 October 2010 in The Netherlands.
New location!
More info will follow soon. |
|
... 422 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
Jammer
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 1336 |
Quote: >For both the music and graphics competition no visible >signature of the artist may be shown during the display of >the actual work, thus the production should be tagless. No >pre-screens with additional information are allowed >either. At request, artists should be able to hand over >working stages.
Last X, first 5 tunes were played anonymous, then someone started to say who done it.
Now please make up your mind: anonymous, or completely open so people have name on screen.
Dont mess it up again plz.
:D
i'm definitely for anonymous entries. unquestionable and fair standard from polish parties ;) |
| |
Count Zero
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 1932 |
Wowsers - hitting 200 in a minute. Awesome.
/cz |
| |
WVL
Registered: Mar 2002
Posts: 902 |
and I'm the mighty #200 :) |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
May I propose a voting system?
Simplify things. My idea:
buy 1000 table tennis balls (or just something 'unique').
Hand one per category to each who paid entrance fee.
Voting = buckets or something.
Either one bucket/bag per entry or everyone writes a number on his ball (nice sentence) and throws it in the category-bucket.
Only one vote per category per scener.
I like the ball idea but thinking again, some piece of paper + pens should suffice.
This will make it SO simple, I'd hope more people would vote then.
Worst case: some guys pick steal balls from others (that didnt have the balls to look after their balls) and hence double-vote. Well, they made quite some effort for that then and the entry might deserve an illegal double-vote for that :)
Anyone with me here?
To sum up, I (personal opinion) favor:
- no electronic voting
- no big lists with lots of numbers
- NOT one vote per entry, but rather one vote (or two) per category (in words: "I like THAT pic the most" not "I liked pix number 27 the 13th most")
- simple, 'mechanical' counting of votes
Cheers,
enthusi |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Enthusi, what if everybody agrees that one or two pics are the best in the gfx category.
How can we ever be sure what order to put the remaining pics in?
|
| |
Hein
Registered: Apr 2004
Posts: 954 |
great idea.
only, x08 had an obvious winner, 200 balls for Booze, what about place 2 till 10? |
| |
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1101 |
Yes! Let's all count thousands of pingpong balls in the middle of the night when you're drunk as hell \o/
Should make some funny pictures ;)
@Jan, the actual show/listen rules for the compo's are still subject to change. The announcing last year was, uhm, crap. |
| |
Frantic
Registered: Mar 2003
Posts: 1648 |
@Mace: Then again.. Should it be taken for granted that a list where every entry is assigned a position is needed? I have the feeling that party votes are generally somewhat random when it comes to lower ranked entries anyway. I mean.. the ping pong ball idea may be a little limited, but there may certainly be nicer ways of doing the voting than some complicated procedure. It is always kinda crappy when it takes a lot of time to count votes, whatever system is used, in the middle of the night after the compo when everyone is tired. |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
Everyone gets 10 pennies to distribute freely among all entries (cups). Weight the cups in the end.
Just something like that :)
Back to good mechanics :)
I didnt mean 'balls' when I wrote 'balls'.
|
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Frantic, you're absolutely right, and I hate long votinglists too.
But the idea Enthusi had, won't work either for the reason I mentioned. And that's all I wanted to point out.
The idea with the pennies sounds good, though!
Although I suspect there will be people who'll bet all their pennies on one horse ;-)
Oh, and make sure people won't be able to grab pennies from one bucket to put them in another...
Talking of which:
 |
| Previous - 1 | ... | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | ... | 44 - Next |
