| |
Monte Carlos
Registered: Jun 2004
Posts: 351 |
Logo converter with colorram
Does anybody knows about a Multicolor Bitmap to charset + screen + colorram converter? I know waste of bitmap to charset + screen converters, but this is not what i mean. I mean, that if the original consists of a background color, two additional colors for the whole screen and one color 0-7 for each character block the desired program should convert it to above mentioned logo format. |
|
... 11 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
TWW
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 541 |
Some people like the mother, some like the daughter...
For me it's easier & the speed is more than good enough for most purposes.
Not to mention the flexibility. |
| |
Moloch
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 2893 |
Quoting TWWSome people like the mother, some like the daughter...
... and some of us both |
| |
algorithm
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 702 |
Baah, makefiles etc.. Just code a pc converter and be done with it :-) (algo writes a note to create a bitmap to mcol/hires char converter :-)) |
| |
Bitbreaker
Registered: Oct 2002
Posts: 500 |
Yeah, fuck for makefiles, proper toolchains and portability. m( |
| |
JackAsser
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 1989 |
Quote: Yeah, fuck for makefiles, proper toolchains and portability. m(
I for one hated auto-tools but then I took my time to actually learn it and oh behave, I'm in heaven. |
| |
Radiant
Registered: Sep 2004
Posts: 639 |
Learning to use Make isn't even hard, and it's a skill that greatly simplifies many development tasks. Or learn to use another build system like CMake or Gradle if Make feels too oldschool. The point is you gain a lot by being able to automate the build process and make smart decisions on what to (re)build and how to build it, and you can easily integrate nearly any existing tool seamlessly into the build process. |
| |
Mr. SID
Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 421 |
Didn't we have that topic recently? :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11108 |
Quote:For me it's easier & the speed is more than good enough for most purposes.
so basically you are not willing to learn to use make. simple as that :)
Quote:Baah, makefiles etc.. Just code a pc converter and be done with it
and make sure it has a gui and no commandline switches - because klickediklickedi RULES! |
| |
algorithm
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 702 |
Quote: Quote:For me it's easier & the speed is more than good enough for most purposes.
so basically you are not willing to learn to use make. simple as that :)
Quote:Baah, makefiles etc.. Just code a pc converter and be done with it
and make sure it has a gui and no commandline switches - because klickediklickedi RULES!
If all the options are available in the GUI, then i personally see no point in incorporating commandline switches, perhaps i am too selfish due to only making it for my specific needs :-) (Although i do have some encoders that are commandline only) |
| |
bepp
Registered: Jun 2010
Posts: 263 |
You could always script a bunch of send keys to the UI =) Or start making already. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 - Next |
