Welcome to our latest new user
danikAdmiral
! (Registered 2024-12-17)
You are not logged in -
nap
CSDb User Forums
Forums
>
CSDb Feedback
>
My suggestion for adding intros
2007-09-24
10:24
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
My suggestion for adding intros
Okay, I've made up the following concept.
When someone adds a new release and he chooses C64 Crack there should be an extra
menu/prompt popping up at the edit screen
saying..
SEARCH INTRO (style like searching for a person)
you can check if it is the proper intro, if YES and the credits of the used intro are accurate to the ones in the database you just click it to have a link from the crack to the intro and vice versa
if the intro wasnt in the database yet or uses a char, music etc. which isnt credited yet on its intro page
you may edit following:
Name: (as mostly intros names are unknown I'd say we either call them like GROUPNAME INTRO or GROUPNAME INTRO 01, 02 etc....
Aka: e.g. if an intro has a special name which doesnt indicate its originating group this is the place to write GROUPNAME INTRO
Released at: not sure if this shall be implented, but some cracks were released at parties, if that info is important for the intro..
Release date: should name the date of the crack this intro got released first
Pouet ID: does Pouet take intros? if yes, this option aswell
Upload Screenshot from this Intro (I personally prefer a screenshot from the very first use)
Released by groups and sceners: at the entries of the intros I already uploaded I did not add this cos they are no official releases, nevertheless it could be interesting when intros were done by someone else than its group e.g. several 711 intros (Tera, Light..) still this should be usually be part of the credits when they would be 100% accurate, meaning having exact joining/leaving dates but this is an utopian wish. 8)
Credits:
Coding, Graphics, Charset, Music, PAL/NTSC fix, Text (anything else?)
now it gets tricky!
It should be possible to alter the release date for each entered credit, e.g. in the Hotline Intro with the different appearances (mostly used by C&C
Hotline Intro 28
) they first used JCH's X-Ray and later Edwin's Groove is in the Heart, having 'Groove is in the Heart' credited on the same day as the first use of the intro would be stupid, it's probably havent been composed on that day yet.
Difficulties occuring: If the newer music is by the same guy as the earlier one...
Shall every intro use be credited? I say no, this would follow to enormous lists e.g. on Woodo/Fairlight or David M. Hanlon being credited a 100 times for one intro, first use is enough.
Events which this releae contains information about (hm, part of the intro or of the crack....)
SIDs ûsed in this release
obviously the release date of each used SID should be changeable manually too! Release dates for SIDs are used on their particular page which lists all the releases they were used inside at the bottom of the page, not using individual release credit date would mess up the correct chronological order of the list
Cracks this intro was used for:
shall be able to merge with the proper crack, in the usual mode (searching, new crack blabla)
Download Links:
Several options
a) none
b) all the cracks this been used for, is interesting and quicker to download than going to all the pages this intro was used on, often used intros like Fairlight's Woodo could be bundled up in a .RAR archive (someone's gotta take care of that, cos they need to be updated... me?!)
c) the ripped intro like on Zyron's site, I personally dislike this option, but it seems to be liked by many sceners, besides it could also be linked to the proper page on intros.c64.org
Upload file (concludes from b+c above)
Reason for not adding a download link (dito)
Shall the intro credit pop in a sceners profile? Yes, but only once, at first use
Shall the intro credit pop in a groups profile? Not sure about that, it was never released like a demo/crack, still could be interesting in that case when e.g. Tera did an intro for 711..
Furthermore I strongly support an original/ripped use of e.g. char, music checker! Both for release and sceners/groups, in the later the ripped credits could be set up in an own list below the original credits list
- suggestions, improvements, criticism, insisting on wrong conclusions in my argumentation, contradictions? let me know
... 35 posts hidden. Click
here
to view all posts....
2007-09-24
19:09
tlr
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 1790
Quote:
which is a weird way of looking at it imho. if group A makes an intro for group B, and group B releases a crack with that intro attached that doesnt magically turn group A into the releasing group. in almost all cases the group which used the intro can be considered the group which released it, the only exception i could think of beeing intros which were released standalone. (and that really was an exception)
And if they really were released stand alone, that would probably have its own entry for the stand alone release.
This makes sense, because otherwise there would be no download if done like with the cracks currently.
2007-09-24
19:19
Burglar
Registered: Dec 2004
Posts: 1098
"Cracks which use this intro" / "Intro used in this crack"
great new feature!
2007-09-24
19:29
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
Quote:
We definately want a link from an intro to the group entry of the group using that intro.
For this to work, some added feature to the db such that it does not appear in the Release list is required.
To rephrase what I suggested earlier:
The quickest fix as I see it is to add a new release type, and that particular release type is made to show up in a list of "Intros used" by that group instead of Releases.
Sounds like a good solution to me as well, intro credits should be listed like usual other entries for single sceners thou, not in a special list, but I guess that's obvious.
Still what bothers me is that release by/link to group, a special link would be best like tlr suggests, the link to a creator group outside the group the intro is for should be given automatically when all information and dates are 100% accurate, listing them 'scener of group'. Like I mentioned somewhere else it is utopic, but the way to go.
2007-09-24
19:45
Steppe
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 1510
Thumbs up, pretty good solution! And Rough doesn't need to be stopped in his recent CSDb frenzy! :D
2007-09-24
19:47
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11384
quite the contrary - time to change all those misplaced download links into proper links to the cracks :o)
2007-09-24
19:53
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
WIP, Gröpi!
2007-09-25
09:22
Oswald
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 5094
my idea with adding game originals was something like discussed in this thread.
you lookup a game, and then you can see the cracks associated with it, order them in time to see which group cracked it 1st, 2nd, etc,etc, and not least you can check out even the original version.
2007-09-25
09:54
Rough
Account closed
Registered: Feb 2002
Posts: 1829
I'll support that idea. Even if the scene crybabies will take their stand again with "NOOOOOOOOOO. ITZ NOOOOOTO SCEEEEENE RELAITED".
There's the option to disfunction demo/cracks in the personal options, so an option to disable Originals for those who are strictly against it should be an easy trick.
adding .G64 and .TAP files, why not? why so narrow minded, it's 2007, plenty of web space, and it's fun
2007-09-25
10:58
wreg
Account closed
Registered: Mar 2004
Posts: 679
i support this idea as well, and i know there will be trouble :-)
we first need this general 'make something invisible'-system so there wont be to much hussle... those new categories could be hidden by default, and each user would have to switch those back on if he'd like to see them
imo: the more there is in the database, the better
2007-09-25
13:42
Mason
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 461
I agree with Rough's idea about not adding them as he said. Its not scene related stuff.
Let other sites handle this impossible task. You need to find out which original the crack were done on, then you need coverscan, docs etc. Worst task is to find out what cracks belongs which original - noone can be sure if e.g. Illusion cracked it from a different distribution than Legend did.
Adding extra data as you mention will be better, but you need to be sure they are accurate.
Previous
-
1
| 2 |
3
|
4
|
5
-
Next
Refresh
Subscribe to this thread:
You need to be logged in to post in the forum.
Search the forum:
Search
All forums
C64 Coding
C64 Composing
C64 Pixeling
C64 Productions
CSDb Bug Reports
CSDb Development
CSDb Discussions
CSDb Entries
CSDb Feedback
CSDb Info
CSDb moderators
CSDb Questions
Messages to moderators
Requests
for
in
Writer & text
Text
Writer
All times are CET.
Search CSDb
All
Releases
Groups
Sceners
Events
BBS
SIDs
-------
Forum
Comments
Advanced
Users Online
Pad/G★P
Oxbow/Xenon
Airwolf/F4CG
DJ Gruby/TRiAD
andym00
Guests online: 90
Top Demos
1
Next Level
(9.7)
2
13:37
(9.7)
3
Mojo
(9.6)
4
Coma Light 13
(9.6)
5
Edge of Disgrace
(9.6)
6
What Is The Matrix 2
(9.6)
7
The Demo Coder
(9.6)
8
Uncensored
(9.6)
9
Comaland 100%
(9.6)
10
Wonderland XIV
(9.6)
Top onefile Demos
1
Layers
(9.6)
2
Party Elk 2
(9.6)
3
Cubic Dream
(9.6)
4
Copper Booze
(9.6)
5
No Listen
(9.6)
6
Rainbow Connection
(9.5)
7
Dawnfall V1.1
(9.5)
8
Onscreen 5k
(9.5)
9
Morph
(9.5)
10
Libertongo
(9.5)
Top Groups
1
Performers
(9.3)
2
Booze Design
(9.3)
3
Oxyron
(9.3)
4
Triad
(9.3)
5
Censor Design
(9.3)
Top NTSC-Fixers
1
Pudwerx
(10)
2
Booze
(9.7)
3
Stormbringer
(9.7)
4
Fungus
(9.6)
5
Grim Reaper
(9.3)
Home
-
Disclaimer
Copyright © No Name 2001-2024
Page generated in: 0.057 sec.