| |
Martin Piper
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 722 |
Proposed rule change
I would like to propose a rule change. If an admin is involved in posting in a thread they are not allowed to use their admin powers to delete posts, issue warnings or lock threads. This would help stop the situations where an admin who loses an argument can abuse their powers to remove the posts they personally disagree with.
|
|
... 138 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
The Communist
Registered: Nov 2002
Posts: 485 |
Quoting Martin PiperPublic or private isn't an argument against the proposed change per se.
From my site it is as you can not expect one running a private site the way you want to have it. You can do proposals but than again if the changes wont happen you have to live with it. |
| |
STE'86
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 274 |
and you took down oswald's new SSDB logo before you made that remark?
now THAT's irony :) |
| |
Martin Piper
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 722 |
CreaMD, by making the rule change public it helps to reinforce the message to mods and posters alike. Which is a good thing.
You seem to have an idea of a recent mod mistake that might be the one I'm thinking of. I'm glad you appear to agree that the posts should not have been deleted. But they have not yet been restored. Is there a reason why not? |
| |
TWW
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 545 |
I would like to propose the following suggestion:
Why not a show-down of the mod's vs. the aniti-mods.
Get a large round table and spread dry crackers all over it. Then whip out your slongs and whomever jizz off last looses and must eat the crackers and has to step down / stop whining according to their standing...
+1 for locking this thread.
and also get sterilized and stop dying... Worse then Falcon Crest at times... |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3057 |
Martin.
What I said was "He should have clicked the evil "censor" button on the posts starting by yours, and fill in the reason "off topic".".
Which means: he should have deleted them without commenting on them. |
| |
Martin Piper
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 722 |
Quote: Quoting Martin PiperPublic or private isn't an argument against the proposed change per se.
From my site it is as you can not expect one running a private site the way you want to have it. You can do proposals but than again if the changes wont happen you have to live with it.
It is a public site that accepts donations. I've donated quite a large chunk of cash in the past. If the site never took a donation you might have a point. But as I said public or private is not relevant to the point.
Now do you have a valid argument against the proposed change? |
| |
JCB
Account closed
Registered: Jun 2002
Posts: 241 |
Quote: Martin.
What I said was "He should have clicked the evil "censor" button on the posts starting by yours, and fill in the reason "off topic".".
Which means: he should have deleted them without commenting on them.
So because groepy doesn't like some of us had something new to say, nobody else gets to see it either. ROFL It was a perfectly valid line of discussion, using a rle list to draw spans. The fact a machine that does that was used as an example has got nothing to do with it and wasn't "name dropping" as groepaz called it. |
| |
Martin Piper
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 722 |
Quote: Martin.
What I said was "He should have clicked the evil "censor" button on the posts starting by yours, and fill in the reason "off topic".".
Which means: he should have deleted them without commenting on them.
They were not off topic. So that would be the wrong action to take. |
| |
STE'86
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 274 |
Quote: Martin.
What I said was "He should have clicked the evil "censor" button on the posts starting by yours, and fill in the reason "off topic".".
Which means: he should have deleted them without commenting on them.
we all know it was nothing to do with OT and everything to do with who had posted.
give us credit for some intelligence PLEASE. |
| |
CreaMD
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 3057 |
Martin. Moderator evaluates, decides, deletes, gives a reason for deletion. That is how it works. What new rule are going to propose? That moderators should vote on every "deletion"?
And as far as your posts in that thread are concerned. Be so kind and don't start the whole debate again. It's pointless.
You don't seem to understand how moderation works.
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 15 - Next |
