| |
wacek
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 513 |
Release id #94464 : Headache
I don't have anything personal against that picture (which is quite good) nor the author (whom I respect), BUT I didn't like the fact that it participated in the gfx compo. Shouldn't animated (yes, I know - colorcycled ;D) entries be excluded and moved to demo compo instead?... |
|
... 8 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
wacek
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 513 |
@yazoo: couldn't agree more ;)
@scout: so for next time, can we expect more compos for other types of entries? (my hinting becomes too blunt, I know ;D) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
interlace:
lda $d016
eor #$01
sta $d016
animation:
inc $d021
GET FUCKING OVER IT!
=) |
| |
enthusi
Registered: May 2004
Posts: 677 |
let me try some definition:
new frames without new content: no animation (headache, interlace, trilace...).
new frames with new content: animation.
Maybe that settles it? ;-) |
| |
Scout
Registered: Dec 2002
Posts: 1570 |
Quoting wackee
@scout: so for next time, can we expect more compos for other types of entries? (my hinting becomes too blunt, I know ;D)
As long as I'm the democompoführer: no.
Furthermore, what JackAsser & Groepaz said :P |
| |
Mace
Registered: May 2002
Posts: 1799 |
Ah, lovely subject... let's start nit picking!
Quote:new frames without new content: no animation (headache, interlace, trilace...).
What is new content?
Two different frames of interlace are not identical (wouldn't make sense), yet it's not animation ;-)
|
| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
Animation: The illusion of movement achieved by showing consecutive images which together form a continuous sequence.
Just blinking of flashing or flickering alone is NOT animation. |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11386 |
it can be (think palette rotation) =) |
| |
ptoing
Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 271 |
Palette rotation emulates animation with single frame progression, so that's kinda different than just a bunch of blinking chars. |
| |
wacek
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 513 |
@Scout: Thank you for your in-depth reasoning and explanation.
@Groepaz, Jackasser: You are always welcome to miss my point entirely. Who gives a rat's ass about the difference between animation, colorchanging, interlace or whatsofuckingever? The point was about allowing non-static graphics in a (traditionally) static category. |
| |
Cruzer
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 1048 |
Why not just let anything compete, and let the voters decide whether it's uberlame with animation, colorcycling or scrolling in a gfx compo?
|
| Previous - 1 | 2 - Next |
