| |
Nova
Registered: Jun 2012
Posts: 13 |
Why wont it let me LOAD....
Screw it,
If i had solved my problem you would all have had to
watch 36 fucking parts of Retroholica by genesis project at X2012 so i guess there is a higher purpose to not letting me irq load with on the fly decompression...
I thought i saw the light when i discovered the
Plushsqueezer V2 and integrated that loader in several
of my unfinished demos but it keeps fucking up some of my stable interupts, not all and i cant see a pattern and i have kind of given up.
I am not a multi platform programer, i love oldschool coding on the 6502 but if you ask me to compile something in a linux environment or some weird C++ cross platform compiling there is just no way, and since life still gets in the way i will most likely give up because there are more fun things to do then failing at compiling a loader with on the fly decompression for a 35 year old fucking computer !!
I managed to compile Dreamload with just the "normal" unpacked irq loading and it worked great but diskspace will soon be an issue..
Could someone please come up with a guide for compiling
both the Krill and Dreamload loaders with decompression and flip disk options in a Windows 7 64bit enviroment..
Sincerly yours:
Nova. |
|
... 58 posts hidden. Click here to view all posts....
|
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11114 |
i find "code completion" nothing but annoying. terrible. first thing i disable when i am forced to use one of those terrible IDEs that do it. |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2839 |
Quoting Groepazi find "code completion" nothing but annoying. terrible. first thing i disable when i am forced to use one of those terrible IDEs that do it. Ironically, some languages and... paradigms practically require IDEs and auto-completion for useful work. Needless to say, these things are avoided by a certain kind of developer (to which group i count myself). |
| |
Krill
Registered: Apr 2002
Posts: 2839 |
Quoting Martin PiperThat explains why some people are amazed how I can write stuff which compiles at the end without using code completion. Quoting Martin PiperJust because I can translate assembler into hex or decimal, doesn't mean I should do it for large projects. :) I can't quite follow this argument. Seems a bit non-sequitur to me, or some kind of oblique straw-man, perhaps. :) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11114 |
yeah same here. fuckthatshit. |
| |
Martin Piper
Registered: Nov 2007
Posts: 634 |
Quote: Quoting Martin PiperThat explains why some people are amazed how I can write stuff which compiles at the end without using code completion. Quoting Martin PiperJust because I can translate assembler into hex or decimal, doesn't mean I should do it for large projects. :) I can't quite follow this argument. Seems a bit non-sequitur to me, or some kind of oblique straw-man, perhaps. :)
It's about tool usage and efficiency. |
| |
Golara
Account closed
Registered: Jan 2018
Posts: 212 |
Quote: It's about tool usage and efficiency.
it's all in the wrist |
| |
soci
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 473 |
Quote: it's all in the wrist
And that's how the discussions went off the rails... |
| |
Compyx
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 631 |
Interesting talk of Ninja about Makefile's and version control: https://youtu.be/po9IY5Kf0Mo?t=3485 (this is about 7 years old) |
| |
chatGPZ
Registered: Dec 2001
Posts: 11114 |
Quote:it's all in the wrist
its called WURST!!! |
| |
mhindsbo
Account closed
Registered: Dec 2014
Posts: 50 |
It's inevitable. We all belong to the generation of ultimate control and I used to think the same about C (or any high level language) as expressed towards IDE's.
I'm sure car tinkerers think the same about automated diagnostic tools and computer controlled injection, etc. In the end it is about productivity as said above. You could write everything in assembler, but you wouldn't accomplish much.
Soon we will probably have AI helping us code and we will be at yet another abstraction layer. |
| Previous - 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 - Next |
